Accessibility Case Studies for Scholarly Communication Librarians and Practitioners
The goal of this resource is to support scholarly communication librarians wanting to implement accessibility measures in their open access, open education, and open data initiatives.
Contents
-
Front Matter
-
I. Introduction
-
II. Thinking from the User's Perspective
-
III. Designing for Accessibility
-
IV. Working with Authors
-
V. Accessibility Policies and Statements
- Part 5: Accessibility Policies and Statements
- Case Study 5.1: PDXOpen
- Case Study 5.2: Sydney University Press
- Case Study 5.3: eCommons, Cornell University Library
- Case Study 5.4: IUScholarWorks
- Case Study 5.5: Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy
- Case Study 5.6: ETD Templates
- Case Study 5.7: Conference Presentation Templates
- Reflection Questions and Activities
- Further Reading
-
VI. Accessibility Audits
- Part 6: Accessibility Audits
- Case Study 6.1: University of Texas at Arlington—An Open Textbook Audit
- Case Study 6.2: University of Nevada at Reno—An Open Textbook Audit
- Case Study 6.3: IUScholarWorks—An Institutional Repository Audit
- Case Study 6.4: Duke University—An Institutional Repository Audit
- Case Study 6.5: Rebus Foundation—Auditing in Community
- Case Study 6.6: California Digital Library—Considerations for User Testing
- Case Study 6.7: University of North Carolina (UNC) Libraries—Considerations for User Testing
- Reflection Questions and Exercises
- Tools and Resources
- Further Reading
-
VII. Workflows
- Part 7: Accessibility Workflows
- Case Study 7.1: University of Houston—An Author Workflow
- Case Study 7.2: Hemingway App—An Author Workflow
- Case Study 7.3: University of British Columbia—An Editor Workflow
- Case Study 7.4: Portland State University— An OER Publisher Workflow
- Case Study 7.5: Mavs Open Press—An OER Publisher Workflow
- Case Study 7.6: Virginia Tech Publishing—An OER Publisher Workflow
- Case Study 7.7: Fulcrum—An OA Publisher Workflow
- Case Study 7.8: University of Sydney Press—A Monograph Publisher Workflow
- Case Study 7.9: Cornell University—An Accessibility Metadata Workflow
- Case Study 7.10: University of Georgia Law Library—An Optical Character Recognition (OCR) Workflow
- Case Study 7.11: Accessibility Request Workflows
- Reflection Questions and Exercises
- Further Reading
-
VIII. Staffing
-
IX. Media Accessibility
- Part 9: Media Accessibility
- Case Study 9.1: University of Washington—A Captioning Workflow
- Case Study 9.2: University of Texas, Austin, and Texas A&M International University—Captioning Workflows
- Case Study 9.3: Oral History Metadata Synchronizer—A Transcript Solution
- Case Study 9.4: UniDescription: A Deeper Dive into Audio Description
- Case Study 9.5: Soundwriting: A Deeper Dive into Captions
- Case Study 9.6: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill—Conscious Editing Guidelines for Visual Description
- Case Study 9.7: Describe It!—A Crowdsourced Alt Text Description Project
- Reflection Questions and Exercises
- Tools and Resources
- Further Reading
-
X. Accessibility for Technical Notation and Data Visualization
- Part 10: Accessibility for Technical Notation and Data Visualization
- Case Study 10.1: Florida State University—An OER Publishing Workflow
- Case Study 10.2: Virginia Tech—OER Publishing Workflows
- Case Study 10.3: Progressive Access—Good Practices for STEM Authoring
- Case Study 10.4: Floe Project—Sonification
- Case Study 10.5: We Count—Open Data and Equity
- Reflection Questions and Exercises
- Resources and Tools
- Further Reading
-
XI. Advocating for Accessibility
- Part 11: Advocating for Accessibility
- Case Study 11.1: Public Knowledge Project Accessibility Interest Group
- Case Study 11.2: Penn State University and OCLC
- Case Study 11.3: University of Washington and Pressbooks
- Case Study 11.4: Faculty as Advocates
- Case Study 11.5: Open Publishing Tools
- Reflection Questions
- Further Reading
-
Back Matter
Book Information
Book Description
This resource is meant for librarians and library students—especially those who work in scholarly communication. It presents mini “case studies” demonstrating how library workers are thinking about web accessibility as they undertake open access publishing, manage institutional repositories, and assemble digital collections.
License
Accessibility Case Studies for Scholarly Communication Librarians and Practitioners by Talea Anderson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.
Subject
Library, archive & information management